The new UN Pact for the Future ends the age of democracy!

While all eyes are on the WHO, the UN calls for the final battle.

People! Hear the signals!

After having adopted the International Health Regulations (IHR) of the WHO on the 1st of June 2024, the United Nations are planning a much more dangerous and far reaching agreement. The UN invites the world community to participate in the Summit of the Future in New York. The so called Pact for the Future is supposed to be adopted.

This Future Summit is supposed to define our common agenda and be globally binding. Nothing less than the abolition of democracy is the goal. Specifically: Undemocratically legitimized bureaucrats will define what will apply to the peoples of this world. But why is no one talking about the Future Pact? Simple: This agreement is more hostile to freedom than any in human history. So there is nothing to see here - move along! This is the motto of the mainstream media.

The UN mutates into a world government

At the end of September, the member states of the United Nations, including Switzerland, will vote on radically changing the UN itself. The way in which nation-states make decisions about the future of our earth will be redefined. The UN will convene in New York City from September 10, 2024, for the 79th session of the General Assembly. A high-level general debate will begin on September 24, 2024.

According to the website of the Future Summit, this is a unique opportunity to close gaps in global governance:

«Multilateral governance, designed in simpler, slower times, is not adequate to today’s complex, interconnected, rapidly changing world.»

I will translate:

These lame governments of the member states with their democratic decision-making processes are not implementing our agenda quickly enough. Especially Switzerland's direct democracy is an outrageous annoyance. So we need to ensure that they no longer have to deal with it at the national level. The people only get in the way. We, the UN, will take over.

The summit document titled What will it deliver? explains the concept:

«The Summit of the Future will build on the 2023 Sustainable Development Goals Summit. Many proposals will turbocharge the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by improving the “how” of global cooperation to in turn enable us to deliver on the “what” by: (a) getting the Sustainable Development Goals back on track, while also (b) responding to new opportunities and risks.»

The UN is to be modernized as UN 2.0:

«UN 2.0 is about enhanced expertise in areas such as innovation, data, digital, foresight, and behavioral science to improve the outcomes of the UN system, support the development of similar expertise in member states, and accelerate collective progress on the SDGs.»

The SDGs are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of the UN Agenda 2030.

Specifically: The UN is to be empowered to push through its agenda without democratic interference. And as quickly as possible. Preferably before 2030, before too many people wake up and realize what's going on.

Furthermore, the UN wants a global financial system that works for everyone. Who defines whether and in whose interest this (does not) work? Shouldn't sovereign states decide for themselves what works for them?

Demo by MASS-VOLL! against the WHO pandemic pact, Bern, 30 March 2022

This leads to: The nation-states lose their currencies. The Swiss franc and others are replaced by Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC). Every transaction is digitally monitored and controlled. What was established through payment cards for refugees will be gradually extended to the entire population: spending controls. The authorities define what and where people are allowed to spend their money. I have elaborated on this here. The global imbalance is supposed to disappear. Rich countries finance poorer countries. Ostensibly, the WHO Pandemic Treaty was postponed this year because no agreement was reached on this issue (rich states pay for mRNA shots for poorer states). However, this very tough nut was pushed into the IHR at the last minute and approved by the member states. Without a veto from the individual member states, this outrageous pharmaceutical financing mechanism will come into force in spring 2025!

The end of national sovereignty

For those who read between the lines and see through the buzzwords, the language of these documents sounds like globalist speak aimed at overriding national and individual sovereignty in favor of a world government. A new currency system, a renewal of the multilateral system - all this is supposed to convince the public that the UN (or another new international body) is needed to safely guide humanity into the future. Who says we can't do this much better ourselves? Who knows better what we want than we do? There is no right to rule over others!

The Pact for the Future would open the door to a world governed by unelected figures. For what is this new, common agenda? The UN will present a comprehensive plan to secure emergency powers, which would allow it to push through a common agenda for all nations in the event of complex global shocks, such as a new pandemic.

Crisis as permanent state of affairs

Sounds familiar? Yes, it sounds like the ideas of the World Health Organization (WHO). No wonder, since the UN is the parent organization of the WHO. Thus, the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, who has been in office since 2017 and was previously long-time head of the Socialist Internationals, has proposed that the General Assembly equip the Secretary-General and the UN network with a standing authority to automatically deploy and operate an emergency platform in the event of a future complex global shock of sufficient magnitude, severity, and reach. This body would exist temporarily - of course.

Emergency laws that disappear again? We remember the frequent extensions of temporary emergency powers during Corona. In Switzerland, these temporary measures are now to be enshrined in the new Epidemics Act (EpidA).

Back to the UN: A corresponding paper lists several examples of what could trigger emergency authority, including major climate events, future pandemic risks, a global disruption of digital connectivity, a major event in outer space and general unforeseen risks (so-called black swans). From a microbe around the corner to the landing of an extraterrestrial, everything is included. Just as the WHO Director-General is to be able to declare any health emergency at his discretion, the UN Secretary-General is to be able to determine a complex global shock for all other cases. Because in times of crisis, things can simply be decided by decree. Who cares about fundamental rights anyway?

Massive violations of fundamental rights are looming

In all cases, our fundamental rights and freedoms will be restricted or even taken away from us entirely. After the now adopted International Health Regulations and the yet to be negotiated WHO Pandemic Treaty, a third horse is sent into the race, so to speak, to ensure that the (real) goals of the UN Agenda 2030 are actually achieved. And these include: digital ID, a central bank digital currency, a CO2 tax, the end of the use of fossil fuels, a social points/credit system, comprehensive digitization of all areas, comprehensive control and surveillance of everyone, vaccination passports, travel restrictions and censorship - the end of free speech. In addition to the WHO as the Ministry of Truth in health matters, the UN will then censor the rest of the misinformation and disinformation that it doesn't like. A Brave New World!

Who will specifically save humanity from global threats? The paper states that the UN would have the authority to oversee the world's stakeholders, including scientists, governments, private sector actors and international financial institutions, to ensure a unified global response to any crisis that is declared. Bureaucrats, mostly without democratic control, will decide the fate of the world.

The UN Pact for the Future seals the end of national sovereignty. The UN globalists rule the world. The age of democracy ends. We are entering the darkest age in human history.

Are we going to simply let this happen ?

Obviously, we are currently not living in a functional democracy with protected fundamental rights. This is the result of a development that began decades ago. Corona was the dress rehearsal. The Pact for the Future marks the endgame, the finale.

The UN must not be given global emergency powers. Carl Schmitt's warning applies:

«Sovereign is he who decides on the state of exception.»

This decision must remain with the nation-states. Here Ralf Dahrendorf:

«Anyone who gives up the nation-state thereby loses the only effective guarantee of his fundamental rights. Anyone who considers the nation-state superfluous today thereby declares - no matter how unintentionally - civil rights to be superfluous.»

The right of peoples to self-determination is one of humanity's most important civilizational achievements. Countless generations before us have made immeasurable sacrifices for the sovereignty of the people and the state. These would be in vain if the UN Pact for the Future was adopted.

Only a sovereign nation-state can effectively protect the fundamental rights of sovereign individuals. But Dahrendorf warns:

«The nation-state is obviously only a necessary, but not a sufficient condition for law and freedom.»

Thus anyone who wants to live in freedom and peace prevents globalism while enabling the protection of fundamental rights in their own country.

---

Please draw attention to this important topic and share this article.

---

Please support our voluntary work:

• Subscribe to our channel on Telegram

---

We would like to thank the author for publishing the article. Guest contributions do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial team.